Entertainment

DRAKEO THE RULER STABBED AT LA CONCERT (VIDEO)

Published

4 years ago

December 19, 2021

FameLord

Drakeo The Ruler was stabbed in the neck at The Once Upon A Time in L.A. Festival at Exposition Park in Los Angeles and the show was forced to shut down.

Snoop Dogg and 50cent who were also billed to perform at the event were quickly evacuated out of the venue while fans and concert goers rushed at the nearest exit to leave the concert which had quickly become a deadly crime scene.

A fight was rumoured to have broken out between the rappers Entourage and some gang members who felt disrespected by some of Drakeo posts on social media and demanded and apology.

Which the rapper refused to give and the gangbangers reportedly jumped him on sight and in the mist of the pandemonium a dagger was used in immobilizing the west coast rapper who slumped instantly to the ground.

The organizers posted on their Instagram page and explained simply saying ,

“The Once Upon A Time In LA Fest is ending early. All performances are now over. Please head to the closest exit and head eastbound on MLK.”

Public information officer for the Los Angeles Fire Department Margaret Stewart confirmed to Famelord.com that paramedics responded to a call concerning a stabbing around 8:40 p.m. local time in the 3900 block of South Hoover Street, and one person was transported to a hospital in critical condition.

And that person has now been revealed to be rapper Drakeo the ruler and while some people on social media are saying Drakeo the ruler is dead, Famelord.com cannot confirm this to be true at this point, so keep your fingers crossed while we try to confirm his death.

Editorials

The Israel-Iran Ceasefire Agreement: Potential Terms and How Trump Did It!!…FIND OUT!!

Published

19 hours ago

June 23, 2025

FameLord

The announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran—referred to as “The 12-Day War”—marks a dramatic de-escalation of what could have spiraled into a prolonged regional conflict. While the exact details of the agreement remain undisclosed, we can analyze likely terms based on historical tensions, geopolitical interests, and the demands of both nations.

Below is how President Trump might have archived this feat.

Trump could have leveraged his close relationship with Netanyahu to privately urge Israel to avoid prolonged war, possibly offering military assurances in exchange for de-escalation. To reach Iran, he might have used backchannel mediators like Oman or Qatar, capitalizing on his Gulf business connections to pass messages discreetly. His proposed 24-hour staggered ceasefire—where Iran halts fire first, followed by Israel—would allow both sides to save face while creating a cooling-off period. Recognizing mutual war fatigue, Trump could have framed the deal as a “dignified exit,” warning Iran that China and Russia wouldn’t intervene if the U.S. fully backed Israel, while reminding Israel that Hamas and Hezbollah remained bigger threats. By announcing the deal on Truth Social, Trump would control the narrative, positioning himself as the indispensable peacemaker and overshadowing current U.S. leadership. Iran might agree to temporary concessions like pausing high-level uranium enrichment, while Israel could secure a halt to missile attacks and U.S. security guarantees. The ceasefire would likely hold short-term due to global pressure, but long-term peace would fail without addressing core issues like Iran’s nuclear program and proxy wars. Ultimately, this scenario would serve Trump’s legacy as a dealmaker—but only delay, not resolve, the deeper conflict.

The Ceasefire Structure

The reported agreement outlines a 24-hour phased ceasefire:

First 12 hours: Iran halts all hostilities.
Next 12 hours: Israel reciprocates, followed by a full cessation of war.

This staggered approach likely ensures neither side exploits the pause for last-minute attacks. A third-party mediator (possibly the U.S.) may monitor compliance.

2. Key Concessions from Israel

A. Halt to Assassinations & Strikes on Iranian Soil

Israel has historically targeted Iranian nuclear scientists and military sites.
The deal may require Israel to pause covert operations inside Iran, at least temporarily.

B. No Further Strikes on Iranian Proxies (Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis)

Israel may agree to reduce airstrikes on groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon or IRGC assets in Syria.
However, this would likely be conditional on Iran restraining its proxies.

C. Limited Public Commitments on Nuclear Threats

Israel might avoid explicit threats against Iran’s nuclear program to prevent escalation.
Behind closed doors, however, sabotage (cyberattacks, espionage) could continue.

3. Key Concessions from Iran

A. Freeze on High-Enriched Uranium Production

Iran may agree to temporarily cap uranium enrichment at 60% (weapons-grade is 90%).
This could be a symbolic gesture to avoid triggering further Israeli or U.S. strikes.

B. Restraint on Proxy Attacks

Iran may pledge to limit arms shipments to Hezbollah and Hamas.
However, full disarmament is unlikely—Tehran relies on proxies for regional influence.

C. Recognition of Israel’s Right to Exist (Indirectly)

While Iran’s regime won’t formally recognize Israel, it may tacitly accept the ceasefire as a de facto acknowledgment.
Hardliners will likely reject this, but Supreme Leader Khamenei could justify it as a tactical pause.

4. U.S. & International Involvement

A. U.S. Security Guarantees

The Biden or Trump administration (depending on the 2025 election) may offer:
- Increased military aid to Israel (e.g., advanced missile defense).
- Sanctions relief for Iran (e.g., oil exports, frozen assets) if compliance holds.

B. Role of Regional Players

Saudi Arabia & UAE: Could push for a broader Middle East security pact.
Russia & China: May act as guarantors for Iran, ensuring no Western-led regime change.

5. Potential Loopholes & Future Risks

A. Proxy War Continues in Shadows

Iran may still fund militant groups, just more discreetly.
Israel could resume targeted killings if it detects nuclear advancements.

B. Short-Term Truce, Not Lasting Peace

Without addressing core issues (nuclear program, Palestinian conflict, regional hegemony), tensions will resurface.

C. Domestic Backlash in Both Nations

In Israel: Far-right ministers (e.g., Ben-Gvir) may reject concessions.
In Iran: Hardliners could accuse the government of weakness.

Conclusion: A Fragile, Temporary Peace

This ceasefire is likely a tactical pause, not a long-term solution. Both nations avoid all-out war but retain their strategic goals:

Israel maintains military dominance.
Iran keeps its nuclear latency and proxy network.

The real test will be whether this truce evolves into broader diplomacy—or becomes merely an intermission before the next conflict.

What’s Next?

Watch for UN Security Council resolutions formalizing the deal.
Monitor Iran’s uranium enrichment levels in coming months.
Observe whether Hezbollah/Hamas attacks decline or continue under the radar.

For now, the world breathes a sigh of relief but the underlying tensions remain as volatile as ever.